Lady Michèle Renouf's trial in Dresden – due to begin on 15th May – has been postponed due to the impact of Covid-19.
The trial is now rescheduled to begin on 16th October 2020 – again in Dresden's District Court (Amtsgericht).
Charges relate to Lady Renouf's impromptu speech on 17th February 2018 at a commemoration of the 1945 British and American terror bombing of Dresden.
Lady Renouf's attorney Wolfram Nahrath is continuing to build a detailed rebuttal of these charges with the help of witnesses from several countries. Further details will be released closer to the trial date, and will appear on this blog and related social media accounts.
The defence team thank all correspondents for their kind messages of support.
In a recent edition of Komsomol Pravda journalist Zahar Prilepin argues: ‘The EU in the worst sense of the word is very much the new USSR.’ This question was posed by the last President of the USSR, Mikhail Gorbachev: ‘Why is the EU trying to recreate the USSR?’ ~ Mikhail Gorbachev:
ReplyDeleteProbably the best resource that Lady Renouf's defence team can muster is a small book, entitled, "Bombing Vindicated" by J. M. Spaight...
ReplyDeleteAs the following excerpt from the US Amazon site states, this book is a WWII publication by a member of the Air Ministry...
"Published in 1944 by a former British Principal Secretary of the Air Ministry as a response to increasing discontent in Britain with the Allied bombing of German cities, this book set out to justify the saturation bombing of civilians.
Reflecting official British government policy, it states clearly that the idea to saturate bomb civilian targets was initiated by the British in May 1940, and that Hitler opposed to this concept and refused to retaliate for months while the German cities were bombed, hoping that 'Churchill would come to his senses.'"
<<< Amazon Link
https://www.amazon.com/Bombing-Vindicated-J-M-Spaight/dp/1684546109/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=bombing+vindicated&qid=1602774146&sr=8-1
>>>
As one can see, this book already admits to the terrible atrocities committed by the Royal Air Force during WWII (along with US complicity).
If the British judicial system does not throw this case out of court based on this admission alone, than I have to wonder how the British populace is to protect themselves from such gross miscarriages of justice...